Taking Stock and the Way Forward |
All stakeholders are invited to send us their comments and views on the Rio de Janeiro meeting and make suggestions with regard to the preparation of next years meeting in New Delhi. You may wish to address topics such as the preparatory process, the logistics of the meeting as well as its format and content. In order to facilitate the assessment of the feed-back we suggest that you fill in the Web based form and put your comments in the following categories.
|
| |
| Please enter your name:
|
|
| Email address:
|
| Affiliation(Organization):
|
| |
| What worked well? |
|
| |
| What worked less well? |
|
| |
| Did the meeting meet your expectations? If not, what were its shortcomings? |
|
| |
| In your opinion, was the Rio meeting in line with the IGF mandate as contained in the Tunis agenda? |
|
| |
| What did you think of the different types of meetings? |
| Main Sessions: |
|
| |
| Workshops: |
|
| |
| Open Forums: |
|
| |
| Best Practice Forums: |
|
| |
| Dynamic Coalition Meetings: |
|
| |
| Was there an adequate balance between the different types of meeting? |
|
| |
| Are there any other kind of organized meetings that you think would be useful to consider? |
|
| |
Should all the different types of events be maintained on the programme of the New Delhi meeting?
If so, should they be maintained in the form they were held in Rio or is there need for any changes to be introduced? |
|
| |
| Did the ‘Village Square’ meet your expectations? If not, what can be improved for the next IGF? |
|
| |
| Is there a need for a synthesis paper which gives an overview of all contributions received and which is translated in all UN languages? |
|
| |
| Other suggestions for improvement in view of the third IGF meeting to be held in New Delhi in December 2008? |
|
| |
| Any other comments or suggestions? |
|
| |
|