[WG WSP] Questionnaire to workshop proposers

[Luis Bobo]

Dear Jutta,

We can go forward with it then.
Could you please provide the missing deadline that you want to set?

Best regards,
Luis

From: Jutta Croll <jcroll at digitale-chancen.de>
Sent: Thursday, 12 September 2019 8:54 AM
To: Luis Bobo <luis.bobogarcia at un.org>
Cc: WG on WS Evaluation IGF <wgwseval at intgovforum.org>
Subject: Re: [WG WSP] Questionnaire to workshop proposers

Dear Luis, thank you so much for your support, you are quite a wizard.

The survey is fine with me.

Jutta
**********************************
Jutta Croll M. A.
Stiftung Digitale Chancen
- Projektleitung Kinderschutz und Kinderrechte in der digitalen Welt -
- Vorsitzende des Vorstands / Chairwoman of the board -
Chausseestr. 15
D-10115 Berlin
Germany

Skype: jcrollSDC

Tel.: ++ 49(0)30-43727730
Mobil: ++ 49(0)163-5493-773
E-Mail: jcroll at digitale-chancen.de<mailto:jcroll at digitale-chancen.de>
URL: www.digitale-chancen.de<http://www.digitale-chancen.de>

English Version:
http://www.digitale-chancen.de/index.cfm/lang.2
**********************************


Am 11.09.2019 um 09:40 schrieb Luis Bobo <luis.bobogarcia at un.org<mailto:luis.bobogarcia at un.org>>:

Dear Jutta, Sylvia, Ben and the WG,

So thanks all. Now the "Why?" space for comments appears only when "Could have been better" or "Very dissatisfied" have been selected, and for the 3 first questions only.
https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2019-workhop-proposers-survey

If the WG is OK with this version, then please specify the deadline date and we will invite the IGF 2019 WS proposers to complete it.

Best regards,
Luis

-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvia Cadena <sylvia at apnic.net<mailto:sylvia at apnic.net>>
Sent: Wednesday, 11 September 2019 5:47 AM
To: WG on WS Evaluation IGF <wgwseval at intgovforum.org<mailto:wgwseval at intgovforum.org>>
Subject: Re: [WG WSP] Questionnaire to workshop proposers

Thanks Luis. It looks good. Just one comment room Ben is not included yet, but in my personal opinion, I think is better not to have too many free text fields, as that makes the analysis very difficult.

My proposal was that only if proposers select "Could have been better" or "Very dissatisfied" the "why" field will show up.

Regards,

Sylvia

________________________________________________________________________

Sylvia Cadena | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs | sylvia at apnic.net<mailto:sylvia at apnic.net> | http://www.apnic.foundation ISIF Asia, WSIS Champion on International Cooperation 2018 & 2019 | http://www.isif.asia | FB ISIF.asia | @ISIF_Asia | G+ ISIFAsia |
6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD,  4101 Australia | PO Box 3646 | +10 GMT | skypeID: sylviacadena | Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 |  Fax: +61 7  3858 3199
* Love trees. Print only if necessary.


On 10/9/19, 11:53 pm, "Luis Bobo" <luis.bobogarcia at un.org<mailto:luis.bobogarcia at un.org>> wrote:

   Dear Jutta, Sylvia and everyone involved,

   You can check a draft for your proposed survey at https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2019-workhop-proposers-survey (this link is available only for MAG at the moment).

   Please propose last changes and set a date for the deadline. Then we can open it for IGF 2019 proposers and send an invitation.

   Best regards,
   Luis
   _______________________________________________
   wgwseval mailing list
   wgwseval at intgovforum.org<mailto:wgwseval at intgovforum.org>
   To unsubscribe and other options please go to http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/wgwseval_intgovforum.org


_______________________________________________
wgwseval mailing list
wgwseval at intgovforum.org<mailto:wgwseval at intgovforum.org>
To unsubscribe and other options please go to http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/wgwseval_intgovforum.org
_______________________________________________
wgwseval mailing list
wgwseval at intgovforum.org<mailto:wgwseval at intgovforum.org>
To unsubscribe and other options please go to http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/wgwseval_intgovforum.org