[Bp_cybersec_2016] Inputs Still Accepted for 2017 Cybersecurity BPF!
Eleonora Anna MAZZUCCHI
EMAZZUCCHI at unog.ch
Mon Oct 2 03:58:38 EDT 2017
Dear Alexandru,
I am pleased to confirm receipt. Many thanks for this contribution.
Kind regards,
Eleonora
From: FRUNZA Alexandru <Alexandru.FRUNZA at coe.int>
To: 'Eleonora Anna MAZZUCCHI' <EMAZZUCCHI at unog.ch>,
"bp_cybersec_2016 at intgovforum.org" <bp_cybersec_2016 at intgovforum.org>
Cc: SEGER Alexander <Alexander.SEGER at coe.int>, "maarten at first.org"
<maarten at first.org>, Markus Kummer <kummer.markus at gmail.com>
Date: 30/09/2017 13:15
Subject: RE: [Bp_cybersec_2016] Inputs Still Accepted for 2017
Cybersecurity BPF!
Dear Eleonora,
Please find attached Council of Europe ? Cybecrime Division inputs for the
IGF 2017 BPF.
Please be so kind to confirm receipt.
Best regards,
Alexandru Frunza-Nicolescu,
Programme Officer
Cybercrime Division
Information Society and Action against Crime Directorate
Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law
Tel +33 390215897
Alexandru.FRUNZA at coe.int
From: Bp_cybersec_2016 [mailto:bp_cybersec_2016-bounces at intgovforum.org]
On Behalf Of Eleonora Anna MAZZUCCHI
Sent: jeudi 21 septembre 2017 13:11
To: bp_cybersec_2016 at intgovforum.org; bp_gender at intgovforum.org;
bpf-localcontent at intgovforum.org; dc at intgovforum.org;
intersessional_2015 at intgovforum.org; outreach_com_2015 at intgovforum.org;
maarten at first.org; solugbile at gmail.com; Markus Kummer
Subject: [Bp_cybersec_2016] Inputs Still Accepted for 2017 Cybersecurity
BPF!
Importance: High
Dear All,
The IGF Secretariat is pleased to inform you that the 2017 Best Practice
Forum (BPF) on Cybersecurity is continuing to accept contributions for its
output document.
Although inputs will be accepted on a rolling basis, please make your
submissions by 30 September for guaranteed inclusion in the document.
The call details, including how to contribute and the questionnaire for
framing inputs, are provided below and on the IGF's website. All
contributions received thus far are available here
For any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Secretariat, BPF
lead expert Maarten van Horenbeeck, and/or co-facilitators Segun Olugbile
and Markus Kummer.
We look forward to hearing from many of you!
Best regards,
Eleonora
IGF Secretariat
BPF on Cybersecurity 2017 - Call for Contributions
All stakeholders are invited to submit written contributions addressing
the below questions and issues to the 2017 IGF BPF on Cybersecurity
mailing list (subscribe:
https://www.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_cybersec_2016_intgovforum.org
). While it is envisioned that initial drafting of the output document
will begin on 15 September, this should be considered a soft deadline as
contributions will be welcome on a rolling basis, particularly from IGF
National and Regional Initiatives (NRIs) and from other relevant entities
or organisations who may be holding meetings relating to cybersecurity
prior to the IGF annual meeting in December. Contributions received past
30 September may not be guaranteed for inclusion in the BPF's output
document.
Contributions will then be compiled and synthesized by the Secretariat,
and further circulated to the community for comment and further work
towards an output document for the BPF to be presented at the 12th IGF in
Geneva, Switzerland from 18-21 December.
All individuals and organizations are asked to kindly try to keep their
contributions to no more than 2-3 pages, and are encouraged to include
URLs/Links to relevant information/examples/best practices as applicable.
When including specific examples or detailed proposals, those may be
included as an Appendix to the document. Please attach contributions as
Word Documents (or other applicable non-PDF text).
Overview:
During 2015 and 2016, the Policy Options for Connecting and Enabling the
Next Billion(s) (CENB) activity within the Internet Governance Forum
identified two major elements:
Which policy options are effective at creating an enabling environment,
including deploying infrastructure, increasing usability, enabling users
and ensuring affordability;
How Connecting and Enabling the Next Billion(s) contributes to reaching
the new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The Best Practice Forum on Cybersecurity realizes that making Internet
access more universal, and thus it supporting the SDGs, has significant
cybersecurity implications. Well-developed cybersecurity helps contribute
to meeting the SDGs. Poor cybersecurity can reduce the effectiveness of
these technologies, and thus limit our opportunities to helping achieve
the SDGs.
BPF participants have conducted an initial study of how the policy
proposals compiled as part of CENB Phase I and II may affect, or be
affected by, cybersecurity implications.
As part of this ongoing effort, the IGF is now calling for public input to
collect additional risks and cybersecurity policy recommendations that can
help mitigate security impacts, and help ensure ICTs and the Internet
continue to help contribute to achieving the SDGs.
Relevant reading:
Summary Records of the BPF
https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/bpf-cybersecurity-1
UN Sustainable Development Goals
http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
Policy Options for Connecting & Enabling the Next Billion(s) - Phase II
https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/index.php?q=filedepot_download/3416/549
Security focused reading of CENB Phase I -
https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/index.php?q=filedepot_download/4904/687
Security focused analysis of CENB Phase II -
https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/index.php?q=filedepot_download/4904/688
Questions:
How does good cybersecurity contribute to the growth of and trust in ICTs
and Internet Technologies, and their ability to support the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs)?
How does poor cybersecurity hinder the growth of and trust in ICTs and
Internet Technologies, and their ability to support the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs)?
Assessment of the CENB Phase II policy recommendations identified a few
clear threats. Do you see particular policy options to help address, with
particular attention to the multi-stakeholder environment, the following
cybersecurity challenges:
Denial of Service attacks and other cybersecurity issues that impact the
reliability and access to Internet services
Security of mobile devices, which are the vehicle of Internet growth in
many countries, and fulfill critical goals such as payments
Potential abuse by authorities, including surveillance of Internet usage,
or the use of user-provided data for different purposes than intended
Confidentiality and availability of sensitive information, in particular
in medical and health services
Online abuse and gender-based violence
Security risks of shared critical services that support Internet access,
such as the Domain Name System (DNS), and Internet Exchange Point (IXP)
communities
Vulnerabilities in the technologies supporting industrial control systems
Use of information collected for a particular purpose, being repurposed
for other, inappropriate purposes. For instance, theft of information from
smart meters, smart grids and Internet of Things devices for competitive
reasons, or the de-anonymization of improperly anonymized citizen data
The lack of Secure Development Processes combined with an immense growth
in the technologies being created and used on a daily basis
Unauthorized access to devices that take an increasing role in people?s
daily lives
Other: describe a cybersecurity issue critical to developing the SDGs in
ways not listed above relevant to your stakeholder community (100 words or
less)
Many Internet developments do not happen in a highly coordinated way - a
technology may be developed in the technical community or private sector,
and used by other communities and interact in unexpected ways.
Stakeholders are managing complexity.
This both shows the strength and opportunities of ICTs and Internet
Technologies, but also the potential risks. New technologies may be
insufficiently secure, resulting in harms when they are deployed:
conversely we may adopt security requirements or measures that prevent the
development, deployment, or widespread use of technologies that would
generate unforeseen benefits. Where do you think lies the responsibility
of each stakeholder community in helping ensure cybersecurity does not
hinder future Internet development?
Where do you think lies the responsibility of each stakeholder community
in helping ensure cybersecurity does not hinder future Internet
development?
What is for you the most critical cybersecurity issue that needs solving
and would benefit most from a multi-stakeholder approach within this BPF?
Should any stakeholders be specifically invited in order for this issue to
be addressed?[attachment "IGF 2017 BPF CoE v3.docx" deleted by Eleonora
Anna MAZZUCCHI/UNOG/GVA/UNO]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_cybersec_2016_intgovforum.org/attachments/20171002/735759f6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 6780 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_cybersec_2016_intgovforum.org/attachments/20171002/735759f6/attachment.png>
More information about the Bp_cybersec_2016
mailing list