[Bp_ipv6] Recording and chat from call #1 (6/23)

[Izumi Okutani]

Thanks everyone for the feedback and suggestions on how we could collect cases this year.

We can certainly reach out to MAG members.

1) Marco's suggestion to draft messages, questions are helpful, as most MAG members from business do not have strong awareness about this subject and they need something to return back to their group.
2) In parallel, if you each have individual contacts with those who made business decisions in IPv6 deployment, suggestions are welcome.

One idea that I am exploring is to start from looking at deployment rates in varous regions, and reach out to private sector in those economies which made business decisions to reach that deployment rate.
Any thoughts around this approach?

We don't have to restrict only to cases with high deployment rate and less successful cases are welcome to be used as a comparison, but would certain help if we can share successful cases, given this it the best practices forum.


I would expect several private companies are less willing to share details of their business decision, and we can certainly keep anonymity. It would be helpful enough if they are able to share key elements of what they thought was important from business perspective.


Before the next call I will coordinate with Sumon and Wim so that we can share general timelines for the group towards producing the finalised output document, as well as draft structure of the output document as a starting point.



Izumi


On 2016/06/30 23:34, Sumon Ahmed Sabir wrote:
> Dear Michael,
>
> Definitely we should try to contact those people. I will definitely try to
> reach few people who have fast hand experience and can share their economic
> benefits.
>
> regards,
>
> Sumon
>
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 19:15 Michael Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 Marco, is anyone willing to take a lead on this, especially if they
>> have access to contacts who are in this needed group of perspectives?
>>
>> Best,
>> -Michael
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> This of course means finding groups that would be willing to share such
>>> information about their decision-making processes. Not always easy!
>>>
>>> Which I see as the biggest challenge for this years efforts and I hope
>>> that the MAG and especially the representatives from the commercial
>>> stakeholder groups can help us with outreach and in explaining people why
>>> there is value in sharing this information, which is often considered
>>> company confidential.
>>>
>>> Maybe as a side effort this group can help come up with some key messages
>>> that can assist in those efforts? Especially aimed at those we likely need
>>> most, the product managers, marcom and financial people.
>>>
>>> Why does sharing this information adds value to the industry eco system
>>> and as such enhances your business model? (Which I realise is pretty close
>>> to the final question of why IPv6 adoption matters).
>>>
>>> Marco
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
>> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_ipv6 mailing list
> Bp_ipv6 at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_ipv6_intgovforum.org
>