[IGFmaglist] MAG evaluation call
Flavio Rech Wagner
flavio at inf.ufrgs.br
Wed Apr 1 07:11:09 EDT 2015
I think we should give the proposers the choice of selecting the
proposals they want to keep.
> Agree needs to be addressed asap. Could be an over sight of the 3
> proposal limit. But shows hard work and commitment to IGF.
> One option...they can be given a choice to withdraw any proposals over
> and above 3. Give a choice and 48 hrs in all such cases. If no
> response. Apply Susan's "time linked cut off" formula and pick the
> first 3 in order of submission.
> Virat Bhatia
> Sent from my iPad
> On 01-Apr-2015, at 4:26 PM, Susan Chalmers <susan at chalmers.associates
> <mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>> wrote:
>> Dear colleagues,
>> Thank you for a very productive call just now. I just wanted to
>> follow up on a relatively minor point. A brief scan of the published
>> proposals shows that some submitted more than 3 proposals. My
>> suggestion is that the first three proposals submitted - time wise -
>> are those that are considered, and that the proposals beyond the 3
>> submitted are discarded.
>> Susan Chalmers
>> susan at chalmers.associates <mailto:susan at chalmers.associates>
>> *CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org <mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Igfmaglist