[IGFmaglist] suggested workshop grading scale descriptions - merging of proposals

Susan Chalmers susan at chalmers.associates
Tue Apr 14 09:11:30 EDT 2015


Dear Flavio,

This sounds like a good approach to me!

Sincerely,
Susan



Susan Chalmers
susan at chalmers.associates

*CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
http://chalmers.associates

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Flavio Rech Wagner <flavio at inf.ufrgs.br>
wrote:

>  Dear Susan
>
> Regarding the merging of proposals, I don't think we should consider the
> option "should be merged with another" in the same grading scale from 1 to
> 5.
>
> If, as an example, a proposal receives scores 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, and 4 from
> six different MAG members, its final average score is 2.5. This does not
> mean, however, that people agree that this proposal has a good potential to
> be merged with some other proposal, since potential for merging can be
> evaluated acoording to different criteria.
>
> I would prefer to have a "tick box" in addition to the score, whereby
> evaluators could indicate that the proposal, independently from the score
> it receives, has a good potential to be merged.
>
> Best
>
> Flavio
>
>
>  Dear MAG colleagues,
>
>  Based upon input from the last virtual meeting, how do the following
> grading scale descriptions sit with everyone?
>
>  1 = proposal has serious problems
> 2 = should not be accepted
> (2.5 = should be merged with another)
> 3 = borderline
>  4 = could be accepted
>  5 = must be accepted
>
>  Please don't hesitate to share your thoughts.
>
>  Sincerely,
> Susan
>
>
> Susan Chalmers
> susan at chalmers.associates
>
> *CHALMERS* & ASSOCIATES
> http://chalmers.associates
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing listIgfmaglist at intgovforum.orghttp://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20150415/7f27e330/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Igfmaglist mailing list