[IGFmaglist] [E] Re: Online attack launched against work of BPF countering online abuse and violence

Tue Oct 13 11:59:41 EDT 2015

Dear all,

Thanks so much for the support. Hugely appreciate it. I'll also extend this to the BPF participants who have been affected by this. 

I think a blog and/or statement on the IGF site would be very helpful, as well as an opportunity to explain the ways we work, and to encourage other less damaging ways of participation. We can then also share this in other IR, IG lists, which can maybe also generate a discussion around this.

To update, APC has also just issued a second statement to  respond to and clarify some of the misinformation (https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/facts-takebackthetech). There has been a few in the IG and IR community who have engaged with some who seemed keen to conversation that certainly made a difference to the tone and energy of the space, at least for a bit! So every act of support really helps. 

Much thanks again,
Jac

- Sent from phone 

> On 13 Oct 2015, at 21:49, Miller, Cheryl A <cheryl.miller at verizon.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Jac,
> 
> I am also so sorry to hear this.  I support the ideas/sentiments below, and as Lynn said please let us know what else we can do in order to be helpful.
> 
> Best,
> Cheryl
> 
> Cheryl Miller
> Director
> International Public Policy and Regulatory Affairs
> Verizon
> 1300 I Street, NW
> Washington, DC 20005
> 202-515-2432 
> 
> 
> From: Igfmaglist <igfmaglist-bounces at intgovforum.org> on behalf of Virginia Paque <virginiap at diplomacy.edu>
> Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 9:43 AM
> To: "Lynn St. Amour" <Lynn at Internet-Matters.org>
> Cc: 'MAG-public' <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> Subject: [E] Re: [IGFmaglist] Online attack launched against work of BPF countering online abuse and violence
> 
> I agree with previous sentiments, and Lynns's request for a set of responses, especially something we can share with our contacts.
> 
> I would also support the a blog AND an IGF website statement addressing the situation.
> 
> Energy and support to you,
> Ginger
> 
> Ginger (Virginia) Paque
> DiploFoundation
> Upcoming online courses: Humanitarian Diplomacy, 21st Century Diplomacy, Diplomatic Law: Privileges and Immunities, Infrastructure and Critical Internet Resources, Multilateral Diplomacy. http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Lynn St.Amour <Lynn at internet-matters.org> wrote:
>> Dear Jac,
>> 
>> so very sorry to hear about this.   Very much hope you and all your colleagues are doing OK!
>> 
>> Subi and Shita had some good thoughts re how to counter/better inform.   Perhaps we should also think about having a more formal set of "responses" or a statement from the MAG (either as a whole or with individual sign-on).
>> 
>> Is there anything specifically you would like the MAG to do?
>> 
>> Lynn
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 6:41 PM, Jac sm Kee <jac at apcwomen.org> wrote:
>> 
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > Dear MAG members,
>> >
>> > As some of you may be aware of, an online attack was launched against
>> > a Twitter conversation that the BPF on countering online abuse and
>> > violence against women was planning, on Friday, 9 October. The attacks
>> > seem to come from persons affiliated to the #GamerGate hashtag, and
>> > centred on the premise that this is yet another attempt of the UN to
>> > "control and censor the internet". The attack is still on-going, and
>> > has now extended to IGF's BPF platform where the draft document is
>> > being hosted for public comments. If you view the comments, you can
>> > get a sense of the motivations.
>> >
>> > A video was also created as "proof" of the UN's attempt to censor the
>> > internet, which basically misrepresents the transparency and openness
>> > of the BPF process as a vulnerability that was exploited. We have
>> > reasons to believe that the instigator, or at least one of them,
>> > participated in the last BPF planning meeting and has subscribed to
>> > the mailing list.
>> >
>> > Since Friday, more than 20,000 tweets that contains abusive,
>> > anti-feminist, violent and sexist content have been targetted at the
>> > hashtag. The conversation's hashtag, #TakeBacktheTech - which was used
>> > as an effort to engage the broader Twitter community already aware of
>> > and working on the topic of online abuse and VAW - is associated with
>> > a campaign that APC has run since 2006 on the issue. As such, APC is
>> > also a subject of the attack. It appears to be a campaign of
>> > misinformation and intimidation. The volunteer who coordinated the
>> > Twitter conversation received several threatening personal emails.
>> >
>> > This clearly has an impact on the continued work of the BPF, and we
>> > would appreciate a discussion around how to move forward on this.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > jac
>> >
>> > - --
>> >
>> > - ---------------------------------
>> > Jac sm Kee
>> > Manager, Women's Rights Programme
>> > Association for Progressive Communications
>> > www.apc.org | www.takebackthetech.net | erotics.apc.org
>> > Jitsi: jacsmk | Skype: jacsmk | Twitter: @jhybe
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
>> >
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWHDcEAAoJEJuohLvI/Y6fkOwP/Al/kckcmpUpkdtcQv80f5hp
>> > 9bQn4HrXsb8i4jREUL3NcP3k9b2lpddIZxaTzofALKV0t9/1F+sfeD1ImyxTZSGI
>> > yspOKIO4E/xJb7udawLAseKWsz0E1Ikljv97Nnrcn7+x3NJJc4WqtTiGv3QMsb43
>> > Amc9M2U9E+vl5icshkDscvP9oAhuyVLYyJau4fKBLKoUSbbx3eokWs7zYzAcEjEb
>> > MqCbUucmoQMuMO5NDJkR2lLE9FH6hjhXN9H4qoWAMqkSIF1HMtM/QpexYIOuWWnW
>> > XElXjS+Lfi4Xl8497I8rXalZuEZeoAfOfqpdApnr62OHXS5AyUP54orU5tlyWjXX
>> > 6b8+5GZkz9gASsj3JaMk3X9jAyRrDjDwW/Tef2yjNnwo+lCTCHQ1/RTFQXkD0qjl
>> > RZ1WzzX6JtidcMVQxQqTF1RkYdObsrkKWXCSgU4CSAJTjVDdovO+N00a3FFIjGmK
>> > e5dAbK90EqrY1/5j15w4J+W5jecy6Py3boYG5oRNncqTFDDia3E1uCGlFtm3x98q
>> > PEtTtxJDT4XhWp7SWhg59SnAKMsPVX1LeYFijSrJ/fTY2ml+TmHMQtNjw07ZB3Uc
>> > Wj0MYT/0QH7rixiHM242WFZ7MysML4P8Qn8c9u3ub2yNFF1uPp4/db8vTmYQduUT
>> > W8N+TMhCqg2hvzOP69O4
>> > =0q0z
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Igfmaglist mailing list
>> > Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20151013/99057da9/attachment.html>