[IGFmaglist] Proposal for Modification for the Workshop Review and Evaluation Process

Wisdom Donkor wisdom.dk at gmail.com
Tue May 31 10:23:58 EDT 2016


1+ to flavio's point specifically allowing MAG members review as many
proposal he/she can. I believe this will help fill in the gap when ever a
member has a busy schedules or engage with other equal important
assignment.

Cheers

*WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)*
E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist
National Information Technology Agency (NITA)/
Ghana Open Data Initiative Project.
ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member,
Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member,
OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member
Email: wisdom_dk at hotmail.com
wisdom.donkor at data.gov.gh
wisdom.dk at gmail.com
Skype: wisdom_dk
facebook: facebook at wisdom_dk
Website: www.nita.gov.gh / www.data.gov.gh
www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Flávio Rech Wagner <flavio at inf.ufrgs.br>
wrote:

> Dear Lynn, Rasha and colleagues
>
> I have a suggestion of a small improvement to the process of distributing
> the review workload among MAG members.
>
> As explained in Rasha's proposal, each workshop proposal is expected to
> have 8 reviews and each MAG member is expected to evaluate around 36-40
> proposals.
>
> In the past, MAG members were requested to review as many proposals as
> possible, within their time availability. And, in fact, many MAG members
> were able review a large number of proposals, well above 36-40 proposals.
>
> I would therefore open the possibility that any MAG member, if s/he is
> willing to do so, is allowed to review not only the workshop proposals
> formally allocated to her/him, but also as many other proposals as
> possible.
>
> I must already apologize for not being able to follow the next virtual
> meeting, as it will take place at 3 am in Brazilian time and I need to lead
> an extremely important event starting at 9 am (again Brazilian time), for
> which I must be entirely fit.
>
> Best regards
>
> Flavio
>
>
> Rasha, Flávio, Susan,
>
> thank you for this proposal.
>
> It is important that all MAG members review the proposal carefully as it is scheduled for review and approval on our Virtual MAG Meeting call this week (Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at  6 am UTC).     If you are not able to make the call, please send in comments so we are able to judge consensus.
>
> Time is tight given our WS review schedule and we need to make a decision.   Input from all MAG members is important as this will determine how the MAG reviews the WS proposal.
>
> Regards,
> Lynn
>
>
>
> On May 29, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Dr. Rasha Abdulla <rasha at aucegypt.edu> <rasha at aucegypt.edu> wrote:
>
> Dear MAG members,
>
> Following the Secretariat's green light, I have finalized the proposal for modifying the Workshop Review and Evaluation Process. This proposal tackles only the second stage of the review process, that of evaluation by MAG members. The first stage (the Secretariat screening), as well as the third stage (final decisions re borderline cases, mergers, etc) remain unchanged.
>
> I hope this proposal arrives at a middle ground for this year that takes care of most of the concerns raised. It also reduces the subjectivity in evaluation, and it considerably reduces the work load per MAG member. Many thanks to Flavio, who suggested the work distribution among MAG members, and to Susan for her comments on the whole process. I'm attaching the new proposal on the second stage of reviewing as well as the current document for the whole review process.
>
> In the interest of time before our next virtual meeting, and since there was little interaction on the WG mailing list, I'm hereby offering the proposal to the full list of MAG members for consideration. I request that the Secretariat include this on Wednesday's meeting agenda if possible.
>
> Best regards.
> Rasha
>
> Rasha A. Abdulla, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor and Past Chair
> Journalism and Mass Communication
> The American University in Cairowww.rashaabdulla.com
> Twitter: @RashaAbdulla<http://twitter.com/rashaabdulla> <http://twitter.com/rashaabdulla>
>
> <MAG Workshop Review and Evaluation Process for IGF 2016 revised.docx><Proposal for Second Stage of Evaluation Process.docx>_______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing listIgfmaglist at intgovforum.orghttp://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing listIgfmaglist at intgovforum.orghttp://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
> --
> Prof. Flávio Rech Wagner		   Tel: +55-51-3308 9494
> Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul  Fax: +55-51-3308 7308
> Instituto de Informática		   E-mail: flavio at inf.ufrgs.br
> Porto Alegre, Brasil			   URL: www.inf.ufrgs.br/~flavio
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20160531/fc5ce66f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Igfmaglist mailing list