[IGFmaglist] update on proposal for MAG WG to support implementation of improvements
Miguel Ignacio Estrada
miestrada at gmail.com
Tue Mar 28 17:56:35 EDT 2017
Thanks Avri. I just wanted to express my support for this WG to continue.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:48 PM, THOMAS-RAYNAUD Elizabeth <
elizabeth.thomas-raynaud at iccwbo.org> wrote:
> Thanks Avri
> As raised on the call I've got some comments on your document(hopefully
> helpful) and am gathering more community input on them but will come back
> here with them later in the week. In the meantime will benefit from
> speaking directly to you this week to flesh out questions.
> As also expressed on the call there's keen interest in understanding how
> this work and the strategic work plan we discussed in the face to face
> meeting might be able to align or merge as not to be redundant.
> We ran out of time but could we ask the Secretariat and MAG Chair to
> update us on that proposal for them to consider how we might take up
> working with a longer view on the work as it build towards goals of the
> IGF during its mandate rather than just an annual programme? Either here or
> on our next virtual call, or both?
> Elizabeth Thomas-Raynaud
> Senior Policy Executive Digital Economy
> and ICC BASIS Director
> International Chamber of Commerce
> From: avri doria <avri at acm.org>
> Sent: 28/03/2017 17:33
> To: igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> Subject: [IGFmaglist] update on proposal for MAG WG to support
> implementation of improvements
> Updated the proposal.
> - Added something on WG leadership under membership
> - Added recommendation on metrics for measuring improvement
> PDF attached
> Live text:
> On 27-Mar-17 10:26, avri doria wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I still have, or hope I have - hard to know what is going on, a proposal
> > for a WG on " *MAG WG to support implementation of improvements" *The
> > drive copy, still open for comment and suggested text changes can be
> > found at:
> > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-WSFh9XQV0hutxuAlxsAJCs8XNtiCDS
> > I have also attached a pdf of the proposal as of yesterday. In answer to
> > Elizabeth's question on WGs, I think of them as needing MAG review to
> > start working, needing to have their charters reviewed and renewed each
> > year (though without a necessary requirement to stop working just
> > because an IGF meetings has been held on some random date), and of
> > including MAG as well as other community members. thanks avri ****
> > On 27-Mar-17 06:42, Lea Kaspar wrote:
> >> Are we expecting any input documents to feed into the agenda point on
> >> MAG working groups? For instance, do we know how many working groups
> >> are on the table at the moment? Are we meant to make decisions on
> >> which WGs should go forward on this call?
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> > _______________________________________________
> > Igfmaglist mailing list
> > Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
Nacho Estrada | @acmuzic <http://twitter.com/acmuzic>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Igfmaglist