[IGFmaglist] Updated Data Governance WG recommendations

Thu Jun 6 08:47:39 EDT 2019

Dear MAG colleagues

Following the request during this morning's discussion, please find attached a graphic to represent the groupings of the 20 workshops under the Data Governance theme.

Thanks to Jutta for sharing the Security WG's graphic to allow me to both provide something which looks similar and to produce it more quickly.

Ben

From: Ben Wallis (CELA)
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 9:29 PM
To: IGF Maglist <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
Subject: Updated Data Governance WG recommendations

Dear MAG

I am following up on two requests made to the Data Governance WG during Wednesday's MAG meeting.

1) Reviewing proposals for mergers within the Top 16

It was requested that we consider any merger suggestions for the Top 16 that came out of the evaluation process to help drive consistency across the processes undertaken by the three WGs.

We have done so and added recommendations for five of the proposed Data Governance Top 16 to consider looking at certain other proposals to see whether there are any concepts or speaker ideas that could be integrated into their approved workshop proposal.

These changes can be seen in the attached updated Recommendations from the Data Governance WG. I attach both a tracked changes version (to easily see the changes) and a clean version (which serves as our final recommendations to the MAG and the Secretariat).

2) Request from Security, Safety, Stability and Resilience WG to consider #170

The Security, Safety, Stability & Resilience WG asked the Data Governance WG to consider whether workshop proposal #170 on Children's Privacy and Data Protection in Digital Contexts (http://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2019-ws-170-childrens-privacy-and-data-protection-in-digital-contexts<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.intgovforum.org%2Fmultilingual%2Fcontent%2Figf-2019-ws-170-childrens-privacy-and-data-protection-in-digital-contexts&data=02%7C01%7Cbewallis%40microsoft.com%7C0d74b67ab95a4df8007908d6e513c459%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636948270397814697&sdata=16nteSWYDnGR2lPc4Eu%2F0wILvtZlVLayG1hg71cvqg4%3D&reserved=0>) could be taken forward under the Data Governance theme. It was proposed under the Security theme but the Security WG felt that it focused at least as much on Data Governance issues. It scored 3.8853 which would mean it would have ranked 24th within the Data Governance theme.

On reflection:
- #170 appears to cover both safety and data governance
- the score it was given, and the fact that it doesn't fill any of the under-represented gaps we found in the Top 16 of the Data Governance proposals, means it would probably not have made the final 20 of the Data Governance thematic track
- but its score was relatively high and it looks at an issue / specific stakeholder group (child protection) that is not covered explicitly in the final 20 of the Data Governance thematic track

So:
- we propose that it is instead taken forward as a cross-cutting proposal which looks at an issue covering both online safety and data governance
- we suggest that it is allocated a slot created from minutes not used by the 40 sessions already put forward by the Data and Security WGs. As we understand it, not all of these 40 sessions are 90 minutes long and therefore the two WGs have not taken up the full allocation of 20 sessions of 90 minutes, suggesting there should be some spare time to allocate to this as a cross-cutting session.

Ben

________________________________
From: Ben Wallis (CELA)
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 11:49:10 AM
To: Lynn St.Amour
Cc: MAG-public
Subject: RE: [IGFmaglist] MAG 2019 Annual Meeting Programme and Workshop Review Process

Thank you, Lynn. On behalf of the Data Governance WG, I am sharing the attached document with the MAG and the Secretariat.

The document:
- recommends the 20 workshops which should make up the Data Governance Thematic Workshops Stream (as well as three further workshops should there be room in the programme)
- suggests how these workshops could be grouped thematically to aid with scheduling, and makes two recommendations for the Secretariat take into account when scheduling
- provides an explanation for how we went about the exercise over the last week

I look forward to seeing the proposals for the other themes and discussing it all during Wednesday's MAG meeting.

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: Lynn St.Amour <Lynn at Internet-Matters.org<mailto:Lynn at Internet-Matters.org>>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2019 9:43 AM
To: Ben Wallis (CELA) <bewallis at microsoft.com<mailto:bewallis at microsoft.com>>
Cc: MAG-public <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org<mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>>
Subject: Re: [IGFmaglist] MAG 2019 Annual Meeting Programme and Workshop Review Process

Thank you Ben,

I think this is the right level, and agree that it would be helpful to have something (verbally or in writing) that as you say outlines the "Rationale for the 20 proposals, e.g. explaining our approach to selecting the 20 workshops, the gaps we identified in the Top 16 and tried to take account of when producing the final list of 20.  The Secretariat may have some additional thoughts and we can ask the MAG what else might be helpful.

Best,
Lynn

> On May 23, 2019, at 5:07 PM, Ben Wallis (CELA) <bewallis at microsoft.com<mailto:bewallis at microsoft.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Lynn, Secretariat
>
> The three Working Groups are reaching the end of step IV in the Workshop Review Process, and must submit a proposed draft Thematic Programme to the MAG by tomorrow, 24 May. At this point, I wanted to check whether there was any particular format and / or contents that you would like the three WGs to conform with.
>
> Within the Data Governance WG, we are looking to come up with a list of 20 proposals (as per the request in the FAQ circulated to the three WGs by Chengetai this week). The list will include:
> - the number and name of each workshop
> - the status and any accompanying recommendations or conditions - as per the Secretariat FAQ, whether we recommend that they be Approved, possibly with suggestions (i.e. non-binding recommendations for improvements), Approved conditionally or Approved conditional on merger
>
> We also aim to recommend how to group these 20 proposals by sub-theme, and possibly also make a recommendation for how to allocate the workshops (i.e. not scheduling workshops of the same sub-theme at the same time).
>
> Is this sufficient? Or is there anything else we should aim to provide, such as:
>        * Ranking of the proposal - ranking among the overall 289 and / or ranking within the theme
>        * Rationale for the 20 proposals, e.g. explaining our approach to selecting the 20 workshops, the gaps we identified in the Top 16 and tried to take account of when producing the final list of 20
>
> Thanks
> Ben
>
>
>
>
> From: Lynn St.Amour <Lynn at Internet-Matters.org<mailto:Lynn at Internet-Matters.org>>
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 4:31 PM
> To: MAG-public <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org<mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>>
> Subject: [IGFmaglist] Fwd: MAG 2019 Annual Meeting Programme and Workshop Review Process
> Importance: High
>
> Dear MAG members,
>
> first, thank you to everyone for all the work and attention paid to the Workshop submission review.  It is obviously an important step in preparing the Annual Meeting Programme, and I know first hand how much work it is.
>
> At this weeks MAG meeting we will be continuing those preparations.  Please review steps III - VI in the attached document as there are a number of critical expectations and next steps.  Specifically, the Thematic WGs are expected to meet virtually (between May 18 - 24) to prepare their thematic stream ahead of sending that to the full MAG on May 24th for review at our May 29th meeting.
>
> As the document outlines, during the 5-7 June MAG meeting, time will be given to the MAG working groups to meet in breakout groups to address any open questions based on MAG discussions.   This time may be outside of our formal meeting times in order to maximize our time together as the MAG and with the community for the Open Consultation.  Ideally, these groups would meet no later than the morning of 5 June (finished by 10 AM or during the lunch break) if they are not able to conclude their Thematic Stream discussions before the 5th of June.
>
> Look forward to progressing this process.
>
> best, Lynn
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: "Lynn St.Amour" <Lynn at Internet-Matters.org<mailto:Lynn at Internet-Matters.org>>
> > Subject: [IGFmaglist] MAG 2019 Annual Meeting Programme and Workshop Review Process
> > Date: April 22, 2019 at 11:19:19 AM EDT
> > To: MAG-public <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org<mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>>
> >
> > Dear MAG members,
> >
> > following on from our MAG meeting in Geneva, and the overall direction agreed there, several meetings were held to advance details re the 2019 Annual Meeting Programme and Workshop Review Process for the MAG.  The WG - Workshop Evaluation (WG-EVAL) met (the meeting was also attended by the Secretariat and the MAG Chair) and the secretariat also reviewed their processes.
> >
> > The attached document reflects those discussions and provides additional information on the process (focused mainly on the later stages).   Please review as it will be discussed on our MAG Meeting later this week.
> >
> > Thanks to the WG - Workshop Evaluation, and the IGF Secretariat for all the effort and fast turnaround.
> >
> > Very best,
> >
> > Lynn
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Igfmaglist mailing list
> > Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org<mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> > To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fintgovforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Figfmaglist_intgovforum.org&data=02%7C01%7Cbewallis%40microsoft.com%7C689bcc78e0744f08371a08d6e066ddca%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636943129749371344&sdata=nLFeZvW95sStpf2WRotKSyQpOp3uhIBY7aObV08jHrU%3D&reserved=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org<mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
> To unsubscribe or manage your options please go to https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fintgovforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Figfmaglist_intgovforum.org&data=02%7C01%7Cbewallis%40microsoft.com%7C689bcc78e0744f08371a08d6e066ddca%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636943129749371344&sdata=nLFeZvW95sStpf2WRotKSyQpOp3uhIBY7aObV08jHrU%3D&reserved=0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20190606/c3a523c3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Data Governance graphic.pptx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Size: 779772 bytes
Desc: Data Governance graphic.pptx
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20190606/c3a523c3/attachment.pptx>