[IGFmaglist] proposal for a netmundial+5 session

[Carlos Afonso]

Dear people, since 2017 several concerned individuals and organizations
have been wondering about a progress evaluation of the crucial
NETmundial documents. The way it was organized, the method of
participation of all stakeholders in a isonomic fashion, and the careful
representation process in producing the two final documents, has become
a sort of international reference for multistakeholder consensus building.

The discussion on evaluating how the Internet (in its several instances,
complexities and consequences) has progressed/advanced regarding the
fundamental topics of the NETmundial document (attached) seems
essential, after five years of its inception, and Dr Kleinwächter and I,
among many others involved in the process at the time, see no other
better opportunity than the UN IGF in Berlin to try and carry out this
NETmundial+5 evaluation.

Dr Kleinwächter has sent me a draft proposal of a IGF main session on
this more than a month ago, which is presented below for discussion. At
the end is a relevant comment from Marilyn Cade. Apologies for taking so
long to submit this.

fraternal regards

--c.a.

ps: copying to Dr Kleinwächter and Marilyn Cade.

===================
From: Wolfgang Kleinwächter
01-Feb-2019

Hi,

here is my very first basic idea for a Main Session:

1. Opening by a short key note to put the NetMundial Conference into the
context of the broader IG discussions (big picture)

5 Minutes

2. Taking Stock of both the Sao Paulo Declaration of Principles and the
Roadmap (it could be done by nominating speakers for each of the
principles and two speakers for the roadmap). Each speaker would cover
within 4 minutes what has been done and where we have problems and where
we have open (new) issues.

40 Minutes

3. Open Mic.

40 Minutes

4. Concluding Remarks: How to integrate the "learned lessons" from
NetMundial into the IG discussions of the 2020s (references to the UN
HLP.DC report and  looking forward towards WSIS +20 in 2025)

5 Minutes

The core part of the Main Session would be the analysis of what has been
done (or not done) to implement the principles and the roadmap. We
should select speakers from relevant institutions/organisations (UN,
HRC, OECD, UNESCO, ICANN, ISOC, ITU etc.). We could invite them to draft
a paper which would summarizes the progress and mark the deficiencies.
Bill Drake and I have already discussed to prepare an e-Book (similar to
what we did for the Istanbul IGF/10 years of WGIG).

I would be happy of we could make some progress here. I hope we get
support from the MAG. The German government, as member of the GAC and
host of the IGF 2019, is very supportive for a NetMundial+5 event.

 Best

Wolfgang

>From Marilyn Cade
01-2-2019
Wolfgang, thanks so much for the great start. I guess I have a fondness
that would have at least one segment for comments from the floor, as I
organized for the WSIS+10, so that we replicate [in a mini form] the
open mike/consultation/4 mikes/one per stakeholder group.
I think that the list is a little restrictive if we are truly
recognizing that it is multi stakeholders who were challenged by
NetMundial, and we need to hear views. We could also invite a
consultation answering 3-5 questions, with limited space to write, so
that would create an input, and a document for pre reading for
participants.

M

-- 

Carlos A. Afonso
[emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário]
[emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise]

Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br
ISOC-BR - https://isoc.org.br


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NETmundial-Multistakeholder-Document.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 557173 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20190309/6d7f8f19/attachment.pdf>