[Wg-mwp] Proposed Poll for IGF 2017
Renata Aquino Ribeiro
raquino at gmail.com
Mon Dec 11 11:51:06 EST 2017
This is great work, thanks!
I'd support it moving forward and I am not sure it should be a
one-time thing, maybe we can integrate it somehow to future IGF
registrations, to have improvements and to have data for a longer
period of time.
Q4 and any other that enumerate themes for discussion could use IGF
Tags for themes
Not sure why Q6 asks only 1 theme of choice. Would be better
"ellaborate on your top ranking choices"
same reason for 7 and 8
Q9 I think is multiple selection
But hey, I would select all fora as places where internet governance is relevant
Perhaps rephrase to something along these lines
Which and how these other existing bodies could work alongside the IGF
with more linkages to enhance the multistakeholder dialogue?
yes multiple selection
Yes, there are many differences between countries and ascertaining
region is important. In that sense, just leaving the city could note
whether it is rural region, underserved etc in further study.
Sorry to send the comments over here, I agree it is a bit fast to give
But, once more, great work.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Lynn St.Amour <st.amour at bluewin.ch> wrote:
> Dear WG members,
> please find below the latest draft of the poll proposed by one of our WG members - Giacomo Mazzone. It is being tabled for discussion on our call later today.
> Giacomo and his expert colleagues in the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) have put this together and they will support the analysis once the poll is complete. I would like to thank Giacomo and his colleagues for their expert support. The question before this WG is whether or not this is ready to go to the MAG for their review and to seek support for launching at this IGF.
> This is a stretch goal as obviously time is tight, though this was discussed several months ago on one of our very first calls.
> As the poll is really quite straight-forward, I am hoping we can all take a few minutes to review it carefully and offer any suggestions for improvement.
> Thanks in advance for all your efforts.
> Wg-mwp mailing list
> Wg-mwp at intgovforum.org
More information about the Wg-mwp