[Wg-mwp] Proposed Poll for IGF 2017

Renata Aquino Ribeiro raquino at gmail.com
Tue Dec 12 16:37:35 EST 2017


Hi

My support for the good :)
And moving this forward to the MAG.

Thanks

Em 12 de dez de 2017 1:58 PM, "Lynn St.Amour" <st.amour at bluewin.ch>
escreveu:

> Dear WG members,
>
> per our call yesterday, I have done my (non-expert) best to incorporate
> the comments from the call and the mail list in the attached document.
> Would appreciate any comments by return email.  IN parallel, I am sending
> the same document to the EBU volunteers and the secretariat in order to
> progress their reviews in parallel.
>
> Given the discussion on the call yesterday and the number of strong
> statements that this was important to launch at the IGF - with of course
> much broader outreach as well, I would like to send this to the MAG
> Wednesday AM for their review and hopefully support.   If there are any
> views WG members would like incorporated in that request to the MAG, please
> let me know ASAP.  I will do my best to reflect accurately our discussion
> (including points of discomfort with timing or any other points that are
> raised).
>
> From my perspective as a longstanding IGF participant (and NOT as Chair),
> I think this poll could be very helpful, and I believe it is a good start.
> We can always improve - but let’s not make perfection the enemy of the
> good.   Concrete suggestions much appreciated.
>
> Best,
> Lynn
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 12, 2017, at 6:38 AM, Wout de Natris <denatrisconsult at hotmail.nl>
> wrote:
> >
> > Lynn, all,
> >
> > Thank you again for an excellent discussion yesterday.
> >
> > For the record I would like to reiterate that in my opinion we only get
> one chance at reaching out to people in the heat of the moment: that is
> next week. All other options are more than suboptimal, as participation in
> all intersessional work proves it to be. What we are working on to change.
> >
> > Having said that, yes, it is of course important to reach those who are
> not present at the IGF (and do not participate remotely) and invite them to
> join in and share their views.
> >
> > So, if the EBU offers this WG the opportunity to make this happen, let's
> embrace it and make it possible for the MAG to decide asap, if it needs to
> do so. We could also see this as our poll, in search of input for our final
> recommendations to the new MAG.
> >
> > Where the questions are concerned, I have already given one suggestion
> yesterday. A second one would be: Do you feel that the main issues of your
> stakeholder group are fully discussed at the IGF? y/n or something like it.
> In search of improvement suggestions.
> >
> > On the last two questions on gender/age, perhaps country also. Will we
> use these answers in any way and are they relevant to the questionnaire?
> Just asking.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Wout
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > De Natris Consult
> > Kamerlingh Onnesstraat 43
>         Tel: +31 648388813
> > 2014 EK Haarlem
>                 Skype: wout.de.natris
> >
> > denatrisconsult at hotmail.nl
> >
> > http://www.denatrisconsult.nl
> >
> > Blog http://woutdenatris.wordpress.com
> >
> >
> > From: Wg-mwp <wg-mwp-bounces at intgovforum.org> on behalf of Lynn
> St.Amour <st.amour at bluewin.ch>
> > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 4:28 PM
> > To: wg-mwp
> > Subject: [Wg-mwp] Proposed Poll for IGF 2017
> >
> > Dear WG members,
> >
> > please find below the latest draft of the poll proposed by one of our WG
> members - Giacomo Mazzone.   It is being tabled for discussion on our call
> later today.
> >
> > Giacomo and his expert colleagues in the European Broadcasting Union
> (EBU) have put this together and they will support the analysis once the
> poll is complete.   I would like to thank Giacomo and his colleagues for
> their expert support.   The question before this WG is whether or not this
> is ready to go to the MAG for their review and to seek support for
> launching at this IGF.
> >
> > This is a stretch goal as obviously time is tight, though this was
> discussed several months ago on one of our very first calls.
> >
> > As the poll is really quite straight-forward, I am hoping we can all
> take a few minutes to review it carefully and offer any suggestions for
> improvement.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for all your efforts.
> >
> > Lynn
> > .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wg-mwp mailing list
> > Wg-mwp at intgovforum.org
> > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-mwp_intgovforum.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wg-mwp mailing list
> > Wg-mwp at intgovforum.org
> > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-mwp_intgovforum.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wg-mwp mailing list
> Wg-mwp at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-mwp_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/wg-mwp_intgovforum.org/attachments/20171212/8398838c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Wg-mwp mailing list