[Wg-mwp] [IGFmaglist] Fwd: IMPORTANT for MAG Review: Proposed Poll to be launched during IGF
Renata Aquino Ribeiro
raquino at gmail.com
Thu Dec 14 07:40:44 EST 2017
That is a v. good idea Sumon.
An informal action of outreach by IGF in other events.
Em 14 de dez de 2017 1:34 PM, "Sumon Ahmed Sabir" <sasabir at gmail.com>
> Dear Chair,
> I also support this poll to be lunched in IGF Meeting.
> Along with that it would be good if we could arrange this poll in some non
> IGF meetings like ICANN meetings, RIR meetings or any other community
> meetings. So that we can get a more clear view on different stake holders
> perception on IGF agendas.
> best regards,
> Sumon Ahmed Sabir
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 at 06:55 Lynn St.Amour <st.amour at bluewin.ch> wrote:
>> Apologies, I am working offline while in travel and neglected to mention
>> in the email how the topics/TAGS were derived. The WG suggested using
>> common IGF TAGS, and the Secretariat suggested the top 20 TAGS (see poll
>> for listing), specifically “the list of top 20 tags was sourced from all
>> our workshop proposals (not just those selected) received this year, in
>> order of popularity. These are the 20 most popular out of 152 different
>> tags, sourced from 268 proposals, so the pool is quite representative and
>> large (relatively speaking - in an IGF context!). Scanning the list
>> quickly, it offers a good balance of topics, including some 'frontier
>> issues' like AI, Big Data and IoT, which we saw a major spike in this year.
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> *From: *"Lynn St.Amour" <st.amour at bluewin.ch>
>> *Subject: **IMPORTANT for MAG Review: Proposed Poll to be launched
>> during IGF*
>> *Date: *December 13, 2017 at 7:44:25 PM EST
>> *To: *IGF Maglist <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>> *Cc: *wg-mwp <wg-mwp at intgovforum.org>
>> Dear colleagues,
>> Please find below a proposed poll that the WG: Multi-year Strategic Work
>> Plan believes would be valuable to launch during the upcoming IGF. This
>> is the work product of the WG: Multi-year Strategic Work Plan. It was
>> considerably improved by poll experts from the European Broadcasting Union
>> who donated their time following a request for expert review. Everyone has
>> worked hard to ensure an unbiased poll. The purpose is to get input on the
>> timely questions the IGF community — and hopefully well beyond the IGF
>> community — believes should be addressed in the IGF.
>> I would like to encourage those MAG members who were part of this WG to
>> add any additional reflections. While this poll was suggested some months
>> ago, like many things it has only come together very recently and certainly
>> the pace has not been ideal.
>> The WG is sending this to the MAG for review, and hopefully support to
>> launch during the Geneva IGF.
>> From my perspective as a longstanding IGF participant (and NOT as Chair),
>> I think this poll could be very helpful, and I believe it is a good start.
>> We can always improve - but let’s not make perfection the enemy of the
>> good. Time is of the essence and so please could you signal your
>> position ASAP:
>> Support Launching at IGF Geneva _____
>> - DO NOT support launching at IGF Geneva (pleas give an indication of
>> your rationale or concern)._____
>> Also, please note this is a poll, it is not a vote. It should inform
>> MAG deliberations. The results will be sent to the MAG and published online
>> for full community review.
>> Thanks in advance for your quick review. There are a few implementation
>> comments still inserted in the attached document, and the best approach
>> this will be determined by the IGF Secretariat.
>> I appreciate the busy time we are all in but it would be very helpful to
>> have your inputs by Saturday COB CET.
>> Best and thank you,
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Wg-mwp