[Wg-mwp] IMPORTANT for MAG Review: Proposed Poll to be launched during IGF
99yongliu at gmail.com
Fri Dec 15 18:20:05 EST 2017
Support Launching at IGF Geneva.
2017-12-16 5:05 GMT+08:00 Carlos Vera <cveraq at gmail.com>:
> I agree with the poll
> Carlos Vera
> On Dec 15, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Wisdom Donkor <wisdom.dk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Lynn,
> I strongly support the lunch of the poll at this years IGF.
> See you all soon.
> *WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)*
> E-government, Internet Governance & Open Government Data Platforms
> ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member,
> Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member,
> OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Member, ITAG Member
> Email: wisdom.dk at gmail.com
> Skype: wisdom_dk
> facebook: facebook at wisdom_dk
> Website: www.data.gov.gh
> www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Lynn St.Amour <st.amour at bluewin.ch>
>> Dear MAG Members,
>> Thank you to those who have responded though the number is very small —
>> time is of the essence and responses by Sunday Dec 17th at 12N CET would be
>> much appreciated.
>> The WG is looking for just a simple yes or no to indicate your position
>> re launching the proposed poll during the IGF. The purpose of the poll is
>> to get input on the timely questions the IGF might address in the coming
>> years. Please review the poll and respond to this email as soon as
>> Best regards,
>> > On Dec 13, 2017, at 7:54 PM, Lynn St.Amour <st.amour at bluewin.ch> wrote:
>> > Apologies, I am working offline while in travel and neglected to
>> mention in the email how the topics/TAGS were derived. The WG suggested
>> using common IGF TAGS, and the Secretariat suggested the top 20 TAGS (see
>> poll for listing), specifically “the list of top 20 tags was sourced from
>> all our workshop proposals (not just those selected) received this year, in
>> order of popularity. These are the 20 most popular out of 152 different
>> tags, sourced from 268 proposals, so the pool is quite representative and
>> large (relatively speaking - in an IGF context!). Scanning the list
>> quickly, it offers a good balance of topics, including some 'frontier
>> issues' like AI, Big Data and IoT, which we saw a major spike in this year.
>> > Best,
>> > Lynn
>> >> Begin forwarded message:
>> >> From: "Lynn St.Amour" <st.amour at bluewin.ch>
>> >> Subject: IMPORTANT for MAG Review: Proposed Poll to be launched during
>> >> Date: December 13, 2017 at 7:44:25 PM EST
>> >> To: IGF Maglist <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>> >> Cc: wg-mwp <wg-mwp at intgovforum.org>
>> >> Dear colleagues,
>> >> Please find below a proposed poll that the WG: Multi-year Strategic
>> Work Plan believes would be valuable to launch during the upcoming IGF.
>> This is the work product of the WG: Multi-year Strategic Work Plan. It was
>> considerably improved by poll experts from the European Broadcasting Union
>> who donated their time following a request for expert review. Everyone has
>> worked hard to ensure an unbiased poll. The purpose is to get input on the
>> timely questions the IGF community — and hopefully well beyond the IGF
>> community — believes should be addressed in the IGF.
>> >> I would like to encourage those MAG members who were part of this WG
>> to add any additional reflections. While this poll was suggested some
>> months ago, like many things it has only come together very recently and
>> certainly the pace has not been ideal.
>> >> The WG is sending this to the MAG for review, and hopefully support to
>> launch during the Geneva IGF.
>> >> From my perspective as a longstanding IGF participant (and NOT as
>> Chair), I think this poll could be very helpful, and I believe it is a good
>> start. We can always improve - but let’s not make perfection the enemy of
>> the good. Time is of the essence and so please could you signal your
>> position ASAP:
>> >> Support Launching at IGF Geneva _____
>> >> - DO NOT support launching at IGF Geneva (pleas give an indication of
>> your rationale or concern)._____
>> >> Also, please note this is a poll, it is not a vote. It should inform
>> MAG deliberations. The results will be sent to the MAG and published online
>> for full community review.
>> >> Thanks in advance for your quick review. There are a few
>> implementation comments still inserted in the attached document, and the
>> best approach this will be determined by the IGF Secretariat.
>> >> I appreciate the busy time we are all in but it would be very helpful
>> to have your inputs by Saturday COB CET.
>> >> Best and thank you,
>> > <PROPOSAL FOR A POLL FOR THE IGF & BEYOND - FOR MAG APPROVAL CLEAN
>> >> Lynn
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Igfmaglist mailing list
>> > Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> > http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>> Wg-mwp mailing list
>> Wg-mwp at intgovforum.org
> Wg-mwp mailing list
> Wg-mwp at intgovforum.org
> Wg-mwp mailing list
> Wg-mwp at intgovforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Wg-mwp