[Wg-mwp] Ideas for further discussion

Israel Rosas Rosas israel.rosasr at presidencia.gob.mx
Thu Oct 19 14:13:01 EDT 2017


Dear Wout, all,

On number 4 (To involve absent stakeholders), I think we should find a way to show the benefits for each stakeholder of being involved in the discussion and projects. Sometimes, Internet Governance issues don’t have specific benefits, which is crucial for actors like governments. Sometimes, governments need to show budget benefits or something tangible in order to fully support IG projects and dedicate staff to follow up the discussions.

All the best,
Israel

Israel Rosas
Coordination of the National Digital Strategy
The Presidency, Mexico
O: +52 01 55 5093 5300 x 7660

El 19/10/2017, a las 09:56, Wout de Natris <denatrisconsult at hotmail.nl<mailto:denatrisconsult at hotmail.nl>> escribió:

Dear all,

Following up on our excellent discussion just now I would like to share some initial ideas to contemplate as potential ways forward and to find engagement from (now absent) stakeholders. They are presented pointwise only and can be elaborated upon when taken up as relevant suggestions.


1) Find solutions and ways forward for complex issues concerning Internet Governance involving several stakeholder groups within the context of the IGF;
2) Compile current best practices from around the globe and translate them into guides for the world to learn from on selected topics;
3) Bring stakeholders together around a specific topic, aimed at formulating potential solutions and find support for implementation of said within multiple stakeholder groups;
4) To involve absent stakeholders by:

  *   find and address the topics that entice them to join;
  *   formulate invitations to join in a personalised way;
  *   an active invitation policy through present stakeholders.

5) Let stakeholders decide on what the best format for their respective challenge is, whether a BPF, Working or Expert Parties/Groups, brainstorm sessions, mailing lists, ??? as they see fit;
6) Decide whether there is room within the IGF for spontaneous action between stakeholders or that all needs to go through the MAG first;
7) Establish whether IGF funding issues change when the "right" topics are addressed so that the secretariat can supply support functions to all groups: What topic or call for action would make you support the IGF financially?
8) If there are several, different initiatives around the globe, within different organisations, around the same topic, could the IGF have a liaising role between these organisations or better, assume a coordinative role and bring them together?
9) Please follow up with your ideas.


In my opinion there is a need to not only discuss the topic of strategic mulityear workplan from a theoretical point of view. Those not engaged now, will not engage from theory. There has to be an element of "yes, you will get to work on ways forward, on solutions, etc." Only through the practical, aloof or absent stakeholders may be enticed to deliver input. From the moment it helps them find solutions to their respective issues.

Looking forward to hear your ideas.

Best,

Wout de Natris

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
De Natris Consult
Kamerlingh Onnesstraat 43                                                        Tel: +31 648388813
2014 EK Haarlem                                                                          Skype: wout.de.natris

denatrisconsult at hotmail.nl<mailto:denatrisconsult at hotmail.nl>

http://www.denatrisconsult.nl<http://www.denatrisconsult.nl/>

Blog http://woutdenatris.wordpress.com<http://woutdenatris.wordpress.com/>






________________________________
________________________________
La información transmitida en este correo y sus documentos adjuntos, es de uso exclusivo del servidor público a quien va dirigido, puede ser materia de solicitud de acceso a la información, por lo tanto, se encuentra regulada por las disposiciones contenidas en la Ley Federal de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública, la Ley General de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de Sujetos Obligados, así como de archivos, control y gestión documental, por lo que se prohíbe a cualquier servidor público distinto al destinatario de revisión, retransmisión, distribución o cualquier otro uso. En caso de recibir este mensaje por equivocación, proceda a eliminarlo y comunicarlo por esta misma vía al remitente.

________________________________
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Wg-mwp mailing list
Wg-mwp at intgovforum.org<mailto:Wg-mwp at intgovforum.org>
http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-mwp_intgovforum.org







________________________________
________________________________

La información transmitida en este correo y sus documentos adjuntos, es de uso exclusivo del servidor público a quien va dirigido, puede ser materia de solicitud de acceso a la información, por lo tanto, se encuentra regulada por las disposiciones contenidas en la Ley Federal de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública, la Ley General de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de Sujetos Obligados, así como de archivos, control y gestión documental, por lo que se prohíbe a cualquier servidor público distinto al destinatario de revisión, retransmisión, distribución o cualquier otro uso. En caso de recibir este mensaje por equivocación, proceda a eliminarlo y comunicarlo por esta misma vía al remitente.

________________________________
________________________________


More information about the Wg-mwp mailing list