[Wg-mwp] [Ext] Re: WG-MWP: 2018 WG Status Report: (was: Webex meeting invitation & Draft Agenda - October 30th, 2018 1500 -1600 UTC)

Lynn St.Amour Lynn at Internet-Matters.org
Fri Jan 11 17:58:15 EST 2019


Hi Veni,

I was assuming a reading by email (to be the most inclusive).

All the inputs that are reflected as new (in red and not many) came directly from comments submitted by WG members at the end of the year so hopefully this will aid everyone's reviews. 

best,
Lynn


> On Jan 11, 2019, at 5:18 PM, Veni Markovski <veni.markovski at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Lynn.
> You say we'll take a reading on Monday - is this by email or phone? I don't have a calendar invite about a possible meeting....
> I will look at it as soon as I can, but not sure if I could do it during the weekend.
> 
> v/
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lynn St.Amour <Lynn at Internet-Matters.org> 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 16:41
> To: wg-mwp <wg-mwp at intgovforum.org>
> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Wg-mwp] WG-MWP: 2018 WG Status Report: (was: Webex meeting invitation & Draft Agenda - October 30th, 2018 1500 -1600 UTC)
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> first, please accept my sincere apologies for the length of time it has taken for me to get back to this.  On a positive note, I have nearly competed the last 2 meeting summaries for the WG-MWP and these will be sent soon.
> 
> We were very close to finalizing the report and the comments received on the last report from Gonzalo, Flavio, Jeremy, Timea, Wout, Titti, etc.  have all been incorporated.  I started with a clean document, and the edits are shown in red for ease.  I incorporated to a great extent direct language from those individuals listed above in order to help ensure support and speed the reviews of the WG.  
> 
> We will take a reading on Monday on whether this is sent to the MAG as ‘a report from the WG' or with reservations.  Please indicate in your response whether you support the report as is.  If you have reservations, please note them and they will be noted in the report to the MAG.
> 
> Also, please note, as MAG members and community members we all act in an individual capacity, as the MAG Terms of Reference state.  Just as the IGF itself is not meant to be a negotiating body amongst stakeholders nor is the MAG or its WGs.  
> 
> Best regards and thank you for all your efforts over the past year.
> 
> Lynn
> 
> 





More information about the Wg-mwp mailing list