[IGFmaglist] Stanford Deliberative Poll and IGF

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Thanks for mentioning this as it prompts me.

They asked me to be one of their experts. Not really sure what I will
have to do other than answer questions, but since I was interested in
learning more about what this was all about and don't mind answering
questions, figured that participating would be a learning experience.

Did not occur to me to mention it here, but now it seems like a good idea.

As for day zero I told them I might be in and out as I had no idea what
I might end up doing on day zero.

avri



On 29-Oct-15 21:41, Lynn St.Amour wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> As many of you may recall, there was a significant discussion on the MAG regarding the Stanford Deliberative Poll planned around the IGF.  At the time, my own discomfort with this particular exercise was three-fold: 1 - the impact on the IGF given the significant time commitment expected of participants during the IGF, and 2 - the way it was introduced, and 3 - initial size and scoping.  After several discussions and additional information from the Stanford team, it was decided the DP would go ahead (possibly in a reduced manner).
>
> Aaannyway, I wanted to let the MAG know I had been contacted (and I am sure many of you as well) to participate.   This morning I took the survey and I am currently scheduled to participate in a 4 or 5 hour deliberative session this weekend.  I will not participate in the sessions planned for Day 0/IGF as they conflict with IGF events.
>
> Given our past discussions, I wanted to let you all know.
>
> Best,
> Lynn
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus